rpms/kdelibs/devel kdelibs.spec

Dennis Gilmore dennis at ausil.us
Thu May 17 03:35:07 UTC 2007


Once upon a time Wednesday 16 May 2007, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 20:58 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > Once upon a time Wednesday 16 May 2007, Christopher Aillon wrote:
> > > Rex Dieter wrote:
> > > > (*) admittedly than wasn't thrilled about such a non-trivial change
> > > > going in at such a late-date, starting at:
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239701#c35
> > >
> > > And you went ahead and did it anyway?  "I'll do it anyway" flippancy
> > > especially from long time contributors is not going to encourage
> > > ex-Core package maintainers to want to add others to the
> > > ACL/co-maintainers lists for the packages they own.  Than should retain
> > > a certain level of respect and I support his decision in this case.
> >
> > The way Than has not participated makes him more a co-maintainer than
> > maintainer.  in all honesty he is lucky to have any access to the kde
> > packages at all right now.  We had to drag him kicking and screaming to
> > work with the community.  Right now i'm willing to have him removed from
> > all Fedora KDE access.
>
> Yeah, this kind of talk is sure to close doors for community
> participation in maintenance of core packages. Last I looked, hostile
> takeovers of packages were not part of the accepted norms in Fedora.

Indeed i should not have been so harsh and i appologise to all.   There really 
needs to be no us and them   we are all the same team.

Dennis
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070516/4bf2c139/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list