Re: Packaging when upstream source filename doesn't change for revisions

[Tom Lane <tgl redhat com>]

"Eric Smith" <eric brouhaha com> writes:
> I'm packaging asl (a GPL'd cross-assembler package for many microprocessors,
> by Alfred Arnold):
> ...
> The upstream maintainer does not change the source filename (or URL)
> when he issues new beta releases.

Should we be packaging beta releases at all?  That seems a bit too
bleeding-edge even for Extras.

(Of course, if he does this for full releases too, you still have
a problem.)

			regards, tom lane