Review queue/FESCo after the merge

[Colin Walters]

On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 13:44 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "CA" == Christopher Aillon <caillon at redhat.com> writes:
> 
> CA> Then we can leave that part out.  There's a lot we can and should
> CA> automate.
> 
> [...]
> 
> Actually all of the relevant tests should get into rpmlint, and then
> we can just run rpmlint.

rpmlint probably shouldn't be doing the "build in mock" test at least,
but I think you have the right idea in that if we have these kinds of
tests, it makes sense to have them as part of a continuous process (i.e.
run them every time spec changes) rather than just the first time we add
some software.