WTF? Inaccessible bug reports?
Jesse Keating
jkeating at redhat.com
Thu Nov 22 16:30:45 UTC 2007
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:21:35 +0100
Olivier Galibert <galibert at pobox.com> wrote:
> Well, I need Core back. Not Core as in "my package is holier than
> yours", that we can do without, but core as in "all these packages
> work well together, can all be installed together, and you will be
> able to do mostly anything with them". Jesse Keating told last june
> on the list, after yet another of my bitchings, that the "Fedora"
> spin, aka the packages on the DVD, were supposed to replace that. The
> F8 release shows it's not the case anymore.
>
> I'm not sure how technically and socially a core-like package
> selection could be organized. Any experience in that area?
A "core" is as good as the people testing it can make it. Modulo the
multilib conflicts which is a problem of it's own, what issues do you
have? I'm open for more discussion on what all should land on the DVD,
note /discussion/, not demands.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071122/524199f5/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list