Re: Another readahead issue

[Rex Dieter <rdieter math unl edu>]

Matthew Saltzman wrote:

> Not sure if I should have started a new thread, but...
> 
> If you *are* going to keep or eventually revive readahead, it would be
> nice to deal with the fact that all the firefox entries in default.later
> are /usr/lib/firefox-2.0.0.3/, but the current firefox is
> firefox-2.0.0.5.

imo, avoid the mess, firefox could use an unversioned folder,
say, /usr/lib/firefox.  I assume there's good reasons not to do this tho,
else the firefox packagin/maintainer would be doing this already, right? :)

-- Rex