[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Another readahead issue
- From: Gilboa Davara <gilboad gmail com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Another readahead issue
- Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 18:45:53 +0200
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 09:17 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>
> > Rex Dieter (rdieter math unl edu) said:
> >> imo, avoid the mess, firefox could use an unversioned folder,
> >> say, /usr/lib/firefox. I assume there's good reasons not to do this tho,
> >> else the firefox packagin/maintainer would be doing this already, right?
> >> :)
> >
> > It doesn't have a consistent ABI, so using a single location would lead
> > to apps breaking when the ABI changes - at least with a different folder
> > they break in a predictable way.
>
> I was afraid of that excuse. Imo, Not a good one, bad packaging practice.
>
> Dependent pkgs already (or should!) include (something like).
> Requires: firefox = <some_version>
>
> -- Rex
>
Let alone the fact that, AFAIK, firefox is not parallel installable.
- Gilboa
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]