should readahead allow generic paths?
Karel Zak
kzak at redhat.com
Mon Oct 15 20:39:24 UTC 2007
> without readahead (0:49):
> with tweaked readahead (updated/sorted lists, run earlier) (0:44):
> so, it's a small win for me. The approach still feels a bit inelegant
> to me, but it does seem to save a bit if it's done properly. But from
> above, if it's done wrong, it hurts a lot more than it helps.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Yes, I agree ;-(
> Tossing a default list out there and hoping for the best probably won't
> work, at any rate.
I'm going to generate new default lists and apply your patches
tomorrow. I'll minimize number of files in these lists -- it means no
more gnome and firefox.
Thanks for your effort and enthusiasm! :-)
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak at redhat.com>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list