Re: Request for Comments: Proposed changes to Fedora development cycle

[Mike McGrath <mmcgrath redhat com>]

Hans de Goede wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:05:51 +0200
> > Hans de Goede <j w r degoede hhs nl> wrote:
> >
> > > So all in all:
> > > -calling it alpha / beta / release candidate instead of test# +1
> > > -no freeze for alpha +1
> > > -early branching (I would say a week for the RC) +1
> > > -making builds in the release branch goto updates-testing after
> > >   branching -1 (esp combined with early branching)
> >
> > Good, discussion!
> >
> > Here is the problem, if the build is not deemed "good" by rel-eng to be
> > in the release after the release candidate where does it go?
>
> Why does this deeming good have to be done by rel-eng? Thats creating 
> both a bottle-neck and a hoop to jump through.

Someone has to do it, who?

   -Mike