[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Request for Comments: Proposed changes to Fedora development cycle



Mike McGrath wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:05:51 +0200
Hans de Goede <j w r degoede hhs nl> wrote:

So all in all:
-calling it alpha / beta / release candidate instead of test# +1
-no freeze for alpha +1
-early branching (I would say a week for the RC) +1
-making builds in the release branch goto updates-testing after
  branching -1 (esp combined with early branching)

Good, discussion!

Here is the problem, if the build is not deemed "good" by rel-eng to be
in the release after the release candidate where does it go?

Why does this deeming good have to be done by rel-eng? Thats creating both a bottle-neck and a hoop to jump through.

Someone has to do it, who?


How about the maintainer?

Regards,

Hans


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]