[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rawhide report: 20071017 changes
- From: Caolan McNamara <caolanm redhat com>
- To: fedora-devel-list redhat com
- Cc: rbhalera redhat com
- Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20071017 changes
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:25:38 +0100
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 22:34 -0400, Build System wrote:
> New package culmus-fonts
> Fonts for Hebrew from Culmus project
>
> New package kacst-fonts
> Fonts for arabic from arabeyes project
>
> fonts-arabic-2.1-1.fc8
> ----------------------
> * Wed Oct 17 2007 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera redhat com> - 2.1-1.fc8
> - This package is now metapackage since kacst and paktype fonts have been moved to their separate packages
>
> fonts-hebrew-0.101-1.fc8
> ------------------------
> * Wed Oct 17 2007 Rahul Bhalerao <rbhalera redhat com> - 0.101-1.fc8
> - This is now a metapackage since Culmus fonts were moved to a separate package
> openoffice.org-langpack-ar - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-arabic
> openoffice.org-langpack-he_IL - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-hebrew
> openoffice.org-langpack-ur - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-arabic
> tetex-fonts-hebrew - 0.1-7.fc6.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
So is this just some sort of bug in the fonts-arabic/fonts-hebrew
meta-packages or do all the above requiring packages need to be fixed to
require the differently named packages.
C.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]