[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: rawhide report: 20071017 changes
- From: "Parag N(पराग़)" <panemade gmail com>
- To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc: rbhalera redhat com
- Subject: Re: rawhide report: 20071017 changes
- Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 18:40:50 +0530
Hi,
On 10/18/07, Jens Petersen <petersen redhat com> wrote:
> Hi Caolan,
>
> Caolan McNamara wrote:
> >> openoffice.org-langpack-ar - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-arabic
> >> openoffice.org-langpack-he_IL - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-hebrew
> >> openoffice.org-langpack-ur - 1:2.3.0-6.3.fc8.ppc64 requires fonts-arabic
> >> tetex-fonts-hebrew - 0.1-7.fc6.noarch requires fonts-hebrew
> >
> > So is this just some sort of bug in the fonts-arabic/fonts-hebrew
> > meta-packages or do all the above requiring packages need to be fixed to
> > require the differently named packages.
>
> It seems fonts-arabic and fonts-hebrew were not in rawhide-20071017
> for some reason - dunno why. They have been updated for the new fonts
> packages (along with fonts-sinhala) so assuming they come back
> everything ought to be ok.
I found %files section missing in all 3 packages. Rahul has built
them now (guess it happened while making them as meta-package). So
this dependency problem will get resolved in tomorrow's rawhide->
20071019.
Thanks,
parag.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]