Le samedi 20 octobre 2007 à 11:52 +0300, Panu Matilainen a écrit : > It's not entirely unlike the case of package translations: Yes package translations need to return in-package too (not necessarily in-spec, but in-srpm) ;) > specspo is used > because the alternative is just so impossible in practise. And non-rh translators complain about it because specspo forces ultra-centralised non-community workflow -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée