[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: catching broken deps



On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:29:06 +0200
Hans de Goede <j w r degoede hhs nl> wrote:

> I'm much in favor of more automated checks like this too. I would
> even like to see them because build failures, were the packager gets
> some method to override them (for example a list of regular
> expressions of rpmlint messages which should be ignored by this
> check).
> 
> Jesse,
> 
> Could you explain why this won't work with mutlilib?

Because of the way we do multilib generation a very long process is
involved to re-determine with the new package set exactly what is
multilib and if this new determination would bring in anything new
and/or lead to broken deps.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]