[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Packaging httrack



On Mo Oktober 29 2007, Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray wrote:
> I am trying to package HTTrack (http://www.httrack.com/) for Fedora.
> Among other things, its upstream versioning is a kind of strange. eg.,
> the versions are 3.41 -> 3.41-2 -> 3.41-3 and so on. See
> http://www.httrack.com/page/4/en/index.html
>
> So what should be the Fedora NEVRA? Would httrack-3.41.3-1 be fine?

Maybe you can convince upstream to use an "_" instead of an "-" in this 
version string. httrack also uses a versionid, which does not include a "-", 
e.g. httrack 3.41-3 is the same as httrack 3.41.22.

Regards,
Till

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]