[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Packaging httrack
- From: "Debarshi 'Rishi' Ray" <debarshi ray gmail com>
- To: "Till Maas" <opensource till name>
- Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Packaging httrack
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 09:06:28 +0530
> Maybe you can convince upstream to use an "_" instead of an "-" in this
> version string.
Yes, I will try that.
> httrack also uses a versionid, which does not include a "-",
> e.g. httrack 3.41-3 is the same as httrack 3.41.22.
I am aware of that. However the 3.41-3-like scheme is more visible.
They used it for naming the tarball, widely throughout
http://www.httrack.com/page/2/en/index.html, in history.txt, in
http://www.httrack.com/page/4/en/index.html and in the output of
httrack --help. 3.41.22 has been used for naming the directory that
one gets on extracting the release tarball.
Therefore I am going with the former scheme after modifying it to
3.41.3 until there is some news from upstream.
Cheers,
Debarshi
--
GPG key ID: 63D4A5A7
Key server: pgp.mit.edu
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]