Multiarch conflicts on devel packages with %doc files

Till Maas opensource at till.name
Tue Oct 30 13:34:06 UTC 2007


On Sa Oktober 20 2007, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 05:07:23AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Does rpm complain about differing timestamps on files, while the
> > contents is identical?
>
> It doesn't complain but rpm -V shows the differences, it is better if
> the stamps are the same for common files coming from different packages.

Would it be enough to use
%verify(not mtime) /path/to/files
in %files?

Maximum rpm does not really say what this does, except that rpm will not 
verify the mtime then.
http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html

Regards,
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 827 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20071030/ea5978f4/attachment.sig>


More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list