Goal: Increased Modularity?

[Les Mikesell]

Jeff Spaleta wrote:
> On 9/4/07, Richi Plana <myfedora at richip.dhs.org> wrote:
>> I guess my point is that if the answer to a lot of people's requests is
>> that "they can spin things themselves", I just thought it would be an
>> important consideration for Fedora to give the respinners that
>> flexibility THROUGH modularization.
> 
> Sure, and my point is, we are attempting to do just that..where there
> is real benefit. Things like virtual provides and the alternatives
> system are used when it makes sense. And "where it makes sense" is
> always in flux. 

Has anyone considered a system that 'makes sense' for multiuser 
operation where different users want different alternative targets at 
once - or the same user wants alternative JVMs for different 
applications at the same time?

-- 
   Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell at gmail.com