Goal: Increased Modularity?
Nicolas Mailhot
nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net
Tue Sep 4 17:54:18 UTC 2007
Le mardi 04 septembre 2007 à 12:57 -0400, Bill Nottingham a écrit :
> Richi Plana (myfedora at richip.dhs.org) said:
> > For instance, if I desired to come up with a spin that doesn't have
> > Sendmail, why must I give up fetchmail, mutt or tor?
>
> Because they *require* a MTA to deliver/send the mail, at least in their
> default configurations
And BTW there's no need for this MTA to be sendmail
[nim at rousalka ~]$ rpm -q fetchmail
fetchmail-6.3.8-2.fc8.x86_64
[nim at rousalka ~]$ rpm -q sendmail
package sendmail is not installed
--
Nicolas Mailhot
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Ceci est une partie de message num?riquement sign?e
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20070904/b095cc0a/attachment.sig>
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list