[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [RFC] /var versus /srv
- From: "Nicolas Mailhot" <nicolas mailhot laposte net>
- To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [RFC] /var versus /srv
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:41:18 +0200 (CEST)
Le Ven 28 septembre 2007 09:40, Alexander Boström a écrit :
> Well, this seems to be spot on the current usage of /var/lib/mysql and
> also with the FHS's definition of /var/lib (*), so I don't really see
> why you think /var/lib/mysql is wrong.
Because /var/ mixes long-term and transient data, generic and
implementation-specific stuff, local and global data, and makes backup
stategies a PITA for everything but SOHO contexts.
People have little wish to comb /var and triage the different
categories (no more than they had the wish to comb /home when it mixed
human users and software users)
Good backup is expensive backup so bulk-var-backup is not scaling
In case of general system failure, or major release update, you're
better of without a lot of /var contents, because some stuff is easier
to set up again than take the risk of restoring a rotten state
--
Nicolas Mailhot
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]