[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Summary of my Fedora 9 Boot Time Testing
- From: Stephen Smalley <sds tycho nsa gov>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Summary of my Fedora 9 Boot Time Testing
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 16:24:06 -0400
On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:14 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Harald Hoyer wrote:
> > Turning off selinux and related services saves 10s overall boot time.
> > Trading off security with boot time. I don't know. But maybe a good
> > starting point for optimization.
>
> Boot time:
> 35s without selinux and without auditd
> 40s with selinux + auditd + restorecond
> 45s with selinux + auditd + restorecond + setroubleshootd
>
> I can live without setroubleshootd..
auditd and restorecond are also optional for selinux. mcstransd should
be optional as well for selinux. None of them existed originally for
selinux; they are all later add-ons.
In the absence of auditd, SELinux avc messages just go
to /var/log/messages instead.
In the absence of restorecond, you might find certain files will be left
mislabeled when re-created, although usually that gets covered
automatically by policy. But you can always restorecon them by hand as
needed.
In the absence of mcstransd, the MCS/MLS label component (:s0) will be
visible and you won't have mapping support for translating categories to
more meaningful names. But you don't really need it if not using
categories for anything.
--
Stephen Smalley
National Security Agency
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]