Re: More Java guidelines questions

[Andrew Haley <aph redhat com>]

Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Andrew Haley <aph redhat com> wrote:
>>  "In some rare cases Java packages might not contain any executable code
>>  whatsoever, so AOT-compiling for gcj would not be required.  An example
>>  of such a package would be one that contained only annotations."
> 
> Perhaps "annotation definitions" would be a bit more precise.

Ok.  I don't think it matters much.

ANdrew.