pruning the fonts list

Bill Nottingham notting at redhat.com
Sat Apr 19 04:18:51 UTC 2008


Warren Togami (wtogami at redhat.com) said: 
> Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> I'm afraid most wins are in 3. 5. 6. & 7., and they depend on l10n
>> groups telling us their wishes, which unfortunately has not happened a
>> lot so far. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Triaging/L10N
>> remains terribly incomplete.
>>
>
> Even if you had full knowledge of fonts safe to remove from the LiveCD
> (because they are good enough for web browsing), this introduces an
> additional problem of incomplete language coverage in Live installs.

The suggestion was not to remove any language coverage - the suggestion
was to remove:

1) core fonts which none of the apps on the LiveCD use
2) *duplicate* fonts for language coverage

Bill




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list