CLA is broken (was: Re: packages without internet source in fedora)

[Jesse Keating]

On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 17:49 +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> But the contributor is supposed to sign it, supposedly without
> getting a legal advice.

Where do we state, suggest, encourage, hint that you should sign it
without getting legal advice?  Seriously?


-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080421/cc60b4e9/attachment.sig>