Fedora 9 Preview issues
Dan Williams
dcbw at redhat.com
Mon Apr 21 17:25:09 UTC 2008
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 13:16 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 12:45:02PM -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Mark any devices that you do not want to control with NetworkManager
> > with NM_CONTROLLED=no in the ifcfg file for that device. Of course that
> > makes the device unmanaged by NM, and therefore it will never be your
> > default route, but it might work for you if you want to keep using NM.
>
> How does NM choose the device to use for the default route? I had a
> problem with NM choosing the device that has NO default route over the
> one that has a default route.
Latest activated wired device, then wireless, then GSM/CDMA. AutoIPv4
devices never get the default route. Do you by chance have a device
that's not really connected to anything?
Dan
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list