[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: FCoA [Was: Re: FESCO]



Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 08:55:16AM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
So, should be there a Fedora Court of Arbitration? ;-) I mean seriously, in so huge and disintegrated body as Fedora community is now, conflicts are bound to happend, and we may need some semi-official means of settling them.

It is already the case. The rule is more or less, bring it to the lists
and then to fesco. But this is costly so having propoer guidelines to
follow like AWOL are better.

Hmm why is it costly ? I've had a few conflicts resolved that way, and in a reasonably speedy fashion. I don't think I've ever seen a call for help on fedora-devel-list going unanswered...

Going over this thread this morning, it read something like this :

13:21 [a]: I quit because of this problem I didn't tell anyone about!
13:23 [b]: It's an outrage! What is FESCo doing ?!?
13:25 [Fesco]: ¿ Qué ?


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]