Re: More Java guidelines questions

[Toshio Kuratomi <a badger gmail com>]

Andrew Haley wrote:
> Jerry James wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Andrew Haley <aph redhat com> wrote:
> > >  "In some rare cases Java packages might not contain any executable code
> > >  whatsoever, so AOT-compiling for gcj would not be required.  An example
> > >  of such a package would be one that contained only annotations."
> > Perhaps "annotation definitions" would be a bit more precise.
>
> Ok.  I don't think it matters much.
GCJ Guidelines have been clarified by adding this paragraph.

-Toshio