is xorg.conf still needed
Dave Airlie
airlied at redhat.com
Wed Apr 30 04:17:46 UTC 2008
On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 00:07 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:21:36PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > > Some or all of those things seem ideal to actually live in user desktop
> > > configuration hooey of some sort instead of static system-wide X server
> > > setup, so maybe the glorious road leads in that direction?
> >
> > In fact, yes, yes it does. See the new gnome-display-properties in F9
> > for some of the bits of user-configured dual-head magic. Thanks to ssp
> > for doing the hard work there.
>
> Right now I need xorg.conf for these things on my desktop Radeon X600
> and also my i965 laptop chip:
>
> Option "AccelMethod" "EXA"
>
> So XVideo works and Render accel works.
In F9 you shouldn't need this EXA should default for intel hw now.
>
> Virtual 3200 1600
>
> So dual-head actually has somewhere to put the second head :-)
This is temporary until we get gpu memory management in place so we can
resize the desktops at runtime.
> Various options for touchpad, so I can tap-to-click and drag.
These may end going via hal or gconf settings I would assume..
>
> Oh, and per-user dual-head/Xinerama configuration doesn't seem to work
> so well when the window manager or session manager loads before the
> dual-head is configured, resulting in all your icons, applications,
> and gnome-panels being restored overlapped on a single-head.
Sounds like some sort of a race.. I'm sure ssp can figure out how to stop this..
Dave.
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list