Re: is xorg.conf still needed

["Bill Crawford" <billcrawford1970 gmail com>]

On 30/04/2008, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora leemhuis info> wrote:

>  That's far from ideal and breaks quite often (for example with some
> proprietary games that have a hard coded rpath to libGL.so.1). I hope Fedora
> and Livna/RPM Fusion can work out a better solution in the future to avoid
> that mess. Steward (he maintains the fglrx and nvidia drivers in Livna) some
> months ago on this list suggested to switch to using alternatives for
> libGL.so.1, but he didn't get much (or any?) feedback on that. :-/

"/usr/lib/libGL.so.1" is, well, a well-established ABI, basically.