libgnutls-openssl and real openssl conflict

John Poelstra poelstra at redhat.com
Fri Aug 29 03:54:16 UTC 2008


Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>> Still we need to tackle this before it does become a bigger problem, 
>> sofar I've seen very little attention for this thread, which is sad as 
>> this is a *real* issue. So far only gkrellm seems to have been used by 
>> people who also use nss_ldap, but sooner or later slrn or one of the 
>> others will hit the same problem, and if more and more apps are moved 
>> to these openssl compat libs then the problem becomes really large!
>>
> 
> +1
> 
> Especially since Fedora is supposed to drive adoption of nss and the nss 
> compat libs to aid in FIPS-140 compliance for downstream distros, this 
> problem will only get bigger.
> 
> -Toshio
> 
> 

Is there a concerted effort or SIG around this in Fedora?  I've been 
seeing a lot of the associated bugs attached to this tracker 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=333741&hide_resolved=1
  as I triage NEW rawhide bugs.

John




More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list