libgnutls-openssl and real openssl conflict
John Poelstra
poelstra at redhat.com
Fri Aug 29 03:54:16 UTC 2008
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>> Still we need to tackle this before it does become a bigger problem,
>> sofar I've seen very little attention for this thread, which is sad as
>> this is a *real* issue. So far only gkrellm seems to have been used by
>> people who also use nss_ldap, but sooner or later slrn or one of the
>> others will hit the same problem, and if more and more apps are moved
>> to these openssl compat libs then the problem becomes really large!
>>
>
> +1
>
> Especially since Fedora is supposed to drive adoption of nss and the nss
> compat libs to aid in FIPS-140 compliance for downstream distros, this
> problem will only get bigger.
>
> -Toshio
>
>
Is there a concerted effort or SIG around this in Fedora? I've been
seeing a lot of the associated bugs attached to this tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=333741&hide_resolved=1
as I triage NEW rawhide bugs.
John
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list