[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Fedora 10 - Boot Analysis
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan infradead org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc: harald redhat com
- Subject: Re: Fedora 10 - Boot Analysis
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 18:02:44 +0100
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:05:27 +0100
Harald Hoyer <harald redhat com> wrote:
>
> Push your kernel patches, so we have a kernel fast boot and
there's nothing left needed for that, 2.6.28-rc has all you need.
> sreadahead.
more tricky; kyle has a cleaned up patch but the fs-devel list tends to
be a black hole ;(
> Persuade our kernel maintainer to compile more modules in
> the kernel.
>
> But, we can't / don't want to drop gnome and most other services, you
> dropped to reach 5 seconds.
it's a total misunderstanding or excuse to claim we dropped services.
Most are started on demand instead. And really, also Fedora could
and should consider being smart about when to start them...
NFS for example should be started on the first mount (trivially
implemented via a post script on the modprobe of the nfs module)
Just throwing in the towel and say "can't do" is how you end up with a
40+ second boot time.
>
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]