Re: Older kernel shipped as F7 kernel update?

[Andrew Farris <lordmorgul gmail com>]

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> /me is a bit puzzled
>
> On "28 Jan 2008 22:14:47 -0700" kernel-2.6.23.14-64.fc7 was shipped as
> update:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-January/msg00968.html
>
> Some minutes ago on "02 Feb 2008 02:01:59 -0700" kernel-2.6.23.14-60.fc7
> was shipped as update:
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-package-announce/2008-February/msg00061.html
>
> $ rpmdev-vercmp 2.6.23.14-64.fc7 2.6.23.14-60.fc7
> 0:2.6.23.14-64.fc7 is newer
>
> Epochs involved? No doesn't look like it:
> rpm -qp kernel-2.6.23.14-60.fc7.i686.rpm --qf '%{EPOCH}\n'
>
> Was is 2.6.23.14-64.fc7 revoked? Never shipped properly? Ohh, no, some
> servers carry it:
> http://ftp.stw-bonn.de/pub/fedora/linux/updates/7/i386/kernel-2.6.23.14-64.fc7.i686.rpm
> http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/7/i386/kernel-2.6.23.14-64.fc7.i686.rpm
>
> /me wonders how long the letter will remain there
>
> Bodhi error?

This did not show up in the updates-testing report for today, so I'm thinking 
there must have been a mistake in there somewhere.  Does that kernel have high 
karma in bodhi? Maybe it got slipped out accidentally or something.

--
Andrew Farris <lordmorgul gmail com> www.lordmorgul.net
 gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3
No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer
----                                                                       ----