Re: system-* tools' ui independence

["Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek" <jakub rusinek gmail com>]

Kelly Miller pisze:
> On 2/28/08, Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek<jakub rusinek gmail com>  wrote:
> > Kelly Miller pisze:
> > > Jakub 'Livio' Rusinek wrote:
> > > > hi,
> > > >
> > > > I said few weeks or months ago, that our system-* tools cannot
> > > > descriminate KDE by using GTK.
> > > >
> > > > YaST authors separated UI library, so you [Red Hat or Community] can
> > > > easily rewrite our tools to integrate well with KDE and GTK-based
> > > > environments.
> > > >
> > > > http://visnov.blogspot.com/2008/02/yast-user-interface-library-is-now.htm
> > > Um, have you SEEN or USED the YaST GTK+ interface? It's one of the most
> > > screwed-up pieces of bad UI I've ever seen in my life...
> > I've seen it and used it. Fast, responsible and very user friendly.
> >
> > YaST-GTK is much better than YaST-Qt.
>
> You're joking, right?

No, I'm not. From users point, YaST-GTK is more readable and better 
organized.

>  I mean, two minutes with YaST-GTK and I'd
> already gotten sick of the fact that it acts like just about
> everything else in Gnome anymore; that the user should only be able to
> reach the minimum of options and anything else should be buried.

You use KDE, right?

> And it's a fact that the GTK installer is utterly brain-dead.

Don't be rude... Most of people do not require LOAD of options, but they 
expect simple "just works", without hassle.