Fwd: closing out old bugs of unmaintained releases
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Tue Jan 8 22:18:09 UTC 2008
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:15:57PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> John Poelstra (poelstra at redhat.com) said:
> > Most seemed to be in agreement that going forward, at the GA of each new
> > release, the version of all existing rawhide bugs would be mass changed to
> > the GA version. For example, for the upcoming release, open rawhide bugs
> > at the time of GA we would changed to Fedora 9. This would have a few
> > benefits as we go forward for each release:
> > 1) encourage the closing of rawhide bugs that qualify
> > 2) anchor the remaining rawhide bugs to the closest GA release so there
> > is a marker in the future as to when they were reported.
>
> Hm, this runs afoul of things like hosted projects that use Fedora bugzilla
> as essentially an upstream bug tracker.
Shouldn't they be using a 'Fedora hosted' product, rather than the
main 'Fedora' product (albeit with possibly the same 'component' value)
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list