PPC needs lots more stack space in rawhide??
David Woodhouse
dwmw2 at infradead.org
Wed Jan 9 16:22:43 UTC 2008
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 11:11 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore <dennis at ausil.us> writes:
> > On Wednesday 09 January 2008, David Woodhouse wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2008-01-08 at 16:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> >>> ... Has gcc started making PPC stack frames a lot
> >>> larger than before? Maybe glibc has gotten more stack-hungry? I'd
> >>> guess on the problem being in gettext() or related code, if it is a
> >>> glibc change, but I haven't tracked it down exactly.
> >>
> >> For a while we used 64KiB pages on ppc64, because IBM insisted on it in
> >> RHEL5 and I didn't notice we'd done the same stupid thing in Fedora. I
> >> believe it was like that in FC6 but I fixed it again for F7.
> >>
> >> Is it possible that the kernel on the build machines is now similarly
> >> afflicted?
>
> > The build system when refreshed in December got updates to RHEL5 so are all
> > running RHEL5 kernels. they do have one extra patch for a bug in tux.
>
> Interesting, but would that affect the rate at which userland code
> consumes stack space?
It'll certainly affect the way it _allocates_ stack space.
> Since posting, I've verified that it still fails at STACK_MIN_SIZE = 48K,
That's still less than a single page. Did you try 64KiB or 128KiB?
--
dwmw2
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list