Linux is not about choice [was Re: Fedora too cutting edge?]
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
Thu Jan 10 16:29:41 UTC 2008
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:31:56 +0100
> Patrice Dumas <pertusus at free.fr> wrote:
>
>> Why not? One could imagine that somebody steps up to package the stuff
>> needed by the old firewire stack? I don't know that issue very well,
>> but I can imagine people wanting to fix things in fedora if they are
>> annoying them.
>
>
> Also, there is a /huge/ difference between "I can package this!" and "I
> can be responsible for all the bug reports regarding this, and help to
> transition folks using this to that, and help improve that along the
> way."
This is the philosophical issue - but it applies whether you support
backwards compatiblity or not. In the now diverged firewire juju thread
there is a comment:
"Awesome, we definitely need more help. Neither krh nor I is able to
spend quite as much time on juju as we'd like right now..."
Of course "stuff happens" and things aren't ever going to be perfect,
but why does a fundamental change go in at the device driver level
without providing a way to revert to the previous version unless there
is at least some expectation of having the resources to fix the new
problems that will almost certainly show up?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell at gmail.com
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list