[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Calling on Fedora/RedHat ML managers to clean up Fedora-list.
- From: Andrew Haley <aph redhat com>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Cc: dex mbox gmail com
- Subject: Re: Calling on Fedora/RedHat ML managers to clean up Fedora-list.
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 09:47:08 +0100
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:10:14PM +0100, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> It surely was on-topic here to talk about whether unfree binary blobs
>> should be included in Fedora.
>
> I think it was. But the million message circular arguments about GPL
> interpretation were most definitely not, and the result of that was that
> everyone put the participants, subject or even the entire list on kill
Sure, that's true, and perhaps we need a little more taste and restraint.
However, there were some untruths about the GPL that needed to be
corrected on the list.
>> Do we really want to say that if any ethical question arises during
>> discussion on Fedora lists, people may not address it?
>
> Do you really want everyone to unsubscribe and run something else.
Their call. I'm not sure I really understand the problem; a thread gets
boring and repetitive, so can it.
Andrew.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]