Re: XULRunner and you

[Ville-Pekka Vainio <vpivaini cs helsinki fi>]

Braden McDaniel wrote:
> Why does xulrunner-devel-unstable provide some of the same headers (at a
> different path) that xulrunner-devel does? I'm specifically noticing
> SpiderMonkey headers; though there might be others.

Good question, I asked about the same thing in my mail a while ago: 
<https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-July/msg01150.html>.

My package mozvoikko needs e.g. mozISpellCheckingEngine.h, which is 
in /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9/spellchecker/ (xulrunner-devel) and 
in /usr/include/xulrunner-sdk-1.9/unstable/ (xulrunner-devel-unstable). Using 
directories like "spellchecker" I can get mozvoikko to build without the 
unstable devel package, but I wonder if I need the "unstable requirements 
style" or will the "stable requirements style" do.


-- 
Ville-Pekka Vainio