[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Let's make a plan for python3.0 in Fedora 10+
- From: seth vidal <skvidal fedoraproject org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Let's make a plan for python3.0 in Fedora 10+
- Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 11:01:23 -0400
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 10:45 -0400, James Antill wrote:
> Probably the most interesting python application is yum, as if it
> breaks you can't easily update/install to fix anything, and it currently
> depends on:
>
> pygpgme - binding
> python-iniparse
> rpm-python - binding
> urlgrabber
> yum-metadata-parser - binding
>
the other question I have is how many of the 'batteries included'
modules in python will not yet be ported to py3k? I mean if something
like bzip2 or fnmatch or logging isn't ported yet we will have issues.
-sv
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]