rpmreaper

seth vidal skvidal at fedoraproject.org
Tue Jun 3 20:27:40 UTC 2008


On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 16:18 -0400, Michael Wiktowy wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 4:02 PM, seth vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > I don't really care if it comes across or bias or not. We have most of
> > the package mgmt infrastructure written in python. It just makes sense
> > to write apps like this to use the same libs, if only b/c then it
> > behaves consistently.
> 
> If you have a package that has the sole task of helping to cull down
> the list of installed packages, you'd want it to depend on the minimum
> number of packages so you could cull, for example, python. 

It is very hard to remove python from a fedora system and have a
functional (or even quasi-functional system) so why don't we start with
that given.


> From the
> description of the OP, it looks like it doesn't do dependency
> resolution, just rpm -e, so there is no behaviour to keep consistent.

/me boggles.
-sv






More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list