[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Orphaned packages not! (splat, gpsman, nec2c)
- From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2 infradead org>
- To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Orphaned packages not! (splat, gpsman, nec2c)
- Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 19:00:08 +0100
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 13:01 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 18:10 +0200, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Maybe it could also be possible for some employees to go through regular
> > sponsorship and use the regular CLA. I understand that it is not always
> > possible, sometime redhat wants to hire somebody to work on packages
> > without going through the fedora formal process, but I think that
> > @redhat people interested in being part of the fedora community are
> > likely to be able to go through the fedora process (even though not when
> > they have just arrived).
>
> Regardless if which method they obtain CLA, once they end their
> employment with Red Hat that CLA is technically no longer valid,
> particularly if they take employment with somebody else. Sadly this
> is a pretty big gaping hole in our system.
Do I need to execute the CLA now? I certainly don't intend to stop
maintaining any of my packages (except RHEL glibc-kernheaders! Yay!).
--
dwmw2
- References:
- Re: Orphaned packages not! (splat, gpsman, nec2c)
- Re: Orphaned packages not! (splat, gpsman, nec2c)
- Re: Orphaned packages not! (splat, gpsman, nec2c)
- Re: Orphaned packages not! (splat, gpsman, nec2c)
- Re: Orphaned packages not! (splat, gpsman, nec2c)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]