[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: rpms/java-1.6.0-openjdk/F-9 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-ptracefix.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-trapsfix.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-INSTALL_ARCH_DIR.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-linux.patch, NONE, 1.1 java-1.6.0-openjdk.spec, 1.46, 1.47



On Sunday 08 June 2008, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> Tom Callaway wrote:
> > Author: spot
> >
> > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/java-1.6.0-openjdk/F-9
> > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv8037
> >
> > Modified Files:
> > 	java-1.6.0-openjdk.spec
> > Added Files:
> > 	java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-ptracefix.patch
> > 	java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc-trapsfix.patch
> > 	java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-INSTALL_ARCH_DIR.patch
> > 	java-1.6.0-openjdk-sparc64-linux.patch
> > Log Message:
> > enable sparc/sparc64 builds
>
> Please submit significant patches like this to Lillian and I for approval
> before committing them, along with an explanation.  I'd prefer to make this
> change in Rawhide unless there's a compelling need for it in Fedora 9.
>
> This isn't the first time a cvsextras member has committed a non-trivial
> patch to the OpenJDK packages without asking.  This makes me second-guess
> my decision to facilitate trivial patches by allowing cvsextras members
> commit access. Maybe I misinterpreted the spirit of the "cvsextras group
> members can commit" flag.  I thought it was designed for checkin
> convenience, but that non-trivial patches were still commit-after-approval.
>  If not, I'll just uncheck the flag and manually commit OpenJDK patches
> after I've approved them.
>
> Tom

Tom,  

Im assuming you are talking about my commit 
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2008-April/msg02319.html  
as the other cvsextras person to have touched java-1.6.0-openjdk package.  I 
looked though the list archives and other than commits by  lillian, lkundrak 
and yourself its the only other commit since the package was created.  I 
worked with lillian as i was developing the changes to add support to the 
spec file to build using the zero engine   it was done as part of Secondary 
Architectures as defined http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures  This 
commit is part of the same effort.  Fully integrating the asm that sun 
released to enable java to work natively on sparc architectures.  These 
patches need to head upstream.  I planned to work with Lillian this week to 
ensure that they do.  We can now build openjdk for 32 and 64 bit sparc linux.  
previously the patches that went upstream only allowed 32 bit to be built.   
We are still getting F-9 completely built so we need these patches commited 
to F-9 so we can build  the latest java-1.5.0-gcj  since it uses the javadoc 
from openjdk to build the documentation which in turn will let us build the 
rest of the java applications.

Regards 

Dennis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]