Re: Let's make a plan for python3.0 in Fedora 10+

[Matej Cepl <mcepl redhat com>]

On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:15:33 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams scripst:
> On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 22:58 +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
>> could you point out why exactly there is "something to do"?
>> 
>> I mean, python3000 is a new language and no replacement so if someone
>> is willing to package it (or a package that depends on py3k) she/he
>> should make sure its a python2.x compatible installation (especially in
>> the naming of the package). That should be all, right?
> 
> Python 2.x *will* be discontinued at some time in the future. It may be
> a few years, but it will happen.

Wouldn't it be more prudent to upgrade just to python 2.6 (asap) and let 
one or two Rawhide cycles to make all warnings disappear?

Matěj

-- 
The content of this message is licensed under a Creative Commons 
Attribution 3.0 License, Some Rights Reserved.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/