Let's make a plan for python3.0 in Fedora 10+
Matej Cepl
mcepl at redhat.com
Fri Jun 6 14:49:42 UTC 2008
On Mon, 02 Jun 2008 21:15:33 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams scripst:
> On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 22:58 +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
>> could you point out why exactly there is "something to do"?
>>
>> I mean, python3000 is a new language and no replacement so if someone
>> is willing to package it (or a package that depends on py3k) she/he
>> should make sure its a python2.x compatible installation (especially in
>> the naming of the package). That should be all, right?
>
> Python 2.x *will* be discontinued at some time in the future. It may be
> a few years, but it will happen.
Wouldn't it be more prudent to upgrade just to python 2.6 (asap) and let
one or two Rawhide cycles to make all warnings disappear?
Matěj
--
The content of this message is licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution 3.0 License, Some Rights Reserved.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
More information about the fedora-devel-list
mailing list