Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Sorry, if I misunderstood. When someone describes an alternative to promote their argument, I assume they are promoting the alternative as well. But what did that mean if it's not what he wants?It just means exactly what it says. If you don't agree with a license terms, you don't get permission to distribute the software even if the licensing terms seem odd to you as noted by a judge in the recent Skype case for violating GPL.http://laforge.gnumonks.org/weblog/2008/05/08/
This simple fact requires no assumption on your part.
There are a near-infinite number of simple facts that someone could post here. But why, unless they mean to promote or advocate them?
-- Les Mikesell lesmikesell gmail com