[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: LVM negates benefits of jounaling filesystems? [was RFE: autofsck]



Andrew Haley wrote:
max bianco wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:38 PM, Andrew Haley <aph redhat com> wrote:
max bianco wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Chuck Anderson <cra wpi edu> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 08:36:31AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
journaling filesystem you really shouldn't have any filesystem metadata
integrity problems on power loss; that is, if you have barriers on
(which ext3 doesn't by default) and if your storage can pass barriers
(which lvm doesn't), or if you have drive write cache disabled (which
hurts performance pretty badly).
I wasn't aware that LVM destroyed the kind of guarantees about
filesystem metadata being written out to disk that jounaling
filesystems rely on?  If so, should we perhaps rethink the decision to
use LVM by default on Fedora installs?

What was the reason for using LVM in the first place. My most recent
install I was really tempted to not go with the defaults but because I
really don't know much about filesystems, I figured the best thing in
that case was stick to the defaults. Now I am reconsidering
again...could someone explain the comparative advantages/disadvantages
? Before i do something stupid .
LVM has a lot of advantages with regard to flexibility: you can add a
disk to a filesystem, for example.  It has a lot of nice features.

but there seems to be some question as to data integrity or ability to
recover data in the event of disaster or am i reading too much into
this?

Yes, you are.  The question here is about barriers, which are off by
default in ext3 anyway.  If you're worried about disaster recovery, you
need to be looking at backup and replication.

Andrew.


I am the victim of the poorly worded question, due entirely to my own ignorance on the subject but I did a little poking around so I'll have another go at it. Is disaster recovery more difficult with an LVM than the older standard partioning scheme?

--
Revenge is for the ignorant


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]