[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: PPC/PPC64 builders not working?



On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 08:37 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
> 
> > Lorenzo Villani wrote, at 06/17/2008 08:12 PM +9:00:
> >> It seems that the PPC/PPC64 builders are stucked with our chainbuild:
> >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=664653
> >> 
> >> As far as I can tell, it has been at least 6-7 hours now that those
> >> builders are processing kdepimlibs build.
> >> 
> >> Regards
> > 
> > For at least 5 days ppc/ppc64 builds are stacked when
> > "dot" command (in graphviz) (or doxygen?) is called, see:
> > 
> > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-June/msg00719.html
> > 
> > Also:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=659366
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=663323
> > 
> > ppc/ppc64 specific bug in graphviz (or doxygen?)
> 
> any bugs filed yet?

Just taking a moment to add 'strace -f' to the doxygen invocation in the
libburn specfile shows interesting behaviour...

[pid  1268] execve("/usr/bin/dot", ["dot"..., "libburn_8h__incl.dot"..., "-Tpng"..., "-o"..., "libburn_8h__incl.png"...], [/* 31 vars */]
 ....
[pid  1268] --- SIGILL (Illegal instruction) @ 0 (0) ---
[pid  1268] rt_sigreturn(0x4)           = 0
[pid  1268] --- SIGILL (Illegal instruction) @ 0 (0) ---
[pid  1268] rt_sigreturn(0x4)           = 0
[pid  1268] --- SIGILL (Illegal instruction) @ 0 (0) ---

Did anyone even bother to file that bug yet?

If not, how do you expect it to get fixed?

I'm used to having to explain the basic mechanisms of "first you tell us
about the bug, and only _then_ can we fix it" to the Great Unwashed on
#fedora, but I kind of expect better from you lot :)

-- 
dwmw2


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]