Re: xulrunner and silent breakage of downstream apps

[Christopher Aillon <caillon redhat com>]

Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Michel Salim <michel sylvan gmail com> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > The recent push of xulrunner-1.9 and Firefox 3 broke Miro and devhelp
> > (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/pending/devhelp-0.19.1-2.fc9)
> > again.
> >
> > Is there a way to declare these kinds of dependencies that we are not
> > using right now? Should Miro and devhelp specifically require xulrunner
> > = %{version}-%{release} -- or perhaps a more administrative solution;
> > block a non-security release of xulrunner for at least one day and
> > automatically notify the maintainers of its dependents?
>
> xulrunner was suppose to stop this from happening with a stable api.

XULRunner provides both a stable and unstable API.  Things aren't going 
to magically be fixed until the applications actually start *using* the 
stable API.