[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [packaging] LSB Package API

From: "Dan Kegel" <dank kegel com>
To: "Denis Washington" <dwashington gmx net>
Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list redhat com>, packaging lists linux-foundation org, opensuse-project opensuse org, lf_desktop lists linux-foundation org, rpm-lsb rpm5 org, ubuntu-devel-discuss lists ubuntu com, rpm-maint lists rpm org, debian-dpkg lists debian org
Subject: Re: [packaging] LSB Package API
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 13:34:31 -0700

On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Denis Washington <dwashington gmx net> wrote:
> I don't think this is a corner case at all. For one thing, propietary
> applications might just don't play a role _because_ there is no really
> good distribution method for them - the typical chicken-and-egg problem.
> (I'm not saying this is the only reason, but an important one.) We're
> just not giving them an easy method of cross-distro integration. I think
> providing this is important.

Sure, and that's why I support the LSB.
Has everybody else given up on it?
- Dan

References:
- LSB Package API
  - From: Denis Washington
- Re: LSB Package API
  - From: Richard Hughes
- Re: LSB Package API
  - From: Denis Washington

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]