Re: kernel module options for cpufreq

[Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com>]

On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 21:16 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:13 PM, Richard Hughes <hughsient gmail com>
> wrote:
> > You really don't want to be using
> > USERSPACE at all.
> 
> seems like cpufreq-applet uses it....

Sure, it shouldn't. If you're using userspace for thermal or latency
reasons, then a setuid applet is totally the wrong way to achieve both
of these :-)

Maybe we can just use these as loadable modules (i.e. not built default)
rather than built-in and loaded by default.

DaveJ, do these suggestions seem acceptable?

Richard.