FESCo Meeting Summary for 2008-03-20

[Jesse Keating]

On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 01:56 +0000, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> One counterproductive effect I see this decision having is that SIGs involved 
> with such technologies will avoid even _mentioning_ the word "guidelines", lest 
> FPC and FESCo will block all their packages until they're ready. So in the long 
> term, that'll mean _less_ specific guidelines, not more, which I assume is 
> entirely against the interest of those who voted for this resolution.
> 
> The way you encourage new guidelines is to make life easy for those working on 
> them. Holding all their packages until the guideline is finalized is the exact 
> opposite.

Hooray for blowing things entirely out of proportion.  I urge you to
read spot's mail on this subject closely and then make an informed
opinion.  Please don't re-interpret our decisions to be the most
ridiculous meaning possible.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/attachments/20080321/4c55d5e7/attachment.sig>