Kevin Kofler wrote:
Josh Boyer <jwboyer <at> gmail.com> writes:I have another proposal I'm in the middle of writing for how to deal with negative karma votes. It's essentially "negative karma votes require a bugzilla entry".That's a bad idea, the reason for a negative karma vote is not always a bug, for example, packages can be -1ed for reasons like "this shouldn't go out before package Y goes out, please either add Y to this update or hold it until the Y update gets pushed".
Wouldn't those be logged in users though (or at least.. should be). Maybe only anon negative karma votes should need a bz entry with them?
-- Andrew Farris <lordmorgul gmail com> www.lordmorgul.net gpg 0xC99B1DF3 fingerprint CDEC 6FAD BA27 40DF 707E A2E0 F0F6 E622 C99B 1DF3 No one now has, and no one will ever again get, the big picture. - Daniel Geer ---- ----